This paper develops a theoretical framework for studying the role of research in communications
policymaking and presents first findings of a project examining these relations for the United
States. At a conceptual level, the paper distinguishes between the epistemic base of
communications policy, ideas that influence communications policy and practical knowledge
that is used to design specific policy measures. The relations between these areas of knowledge
are complicated and multifaceted but lie at the root of understanding the role of research in
policymaking. The paper also presents selected findings from two case studies (media
ownership, spectrum policy) that allow a more detailed examination of some of the conceptual
claims. As the cases illustrate, research does matter but many contingencies apply to whether it
is recognized and influential. The paper concludes with a brief synthesis of the main insights
and an analysis of the structural conditions of policymaking and academic research that might
impede a more fruitful exchange of information between the two realms.

Paper submitted to the Communications Law and Policy Division
International Communications Association (Draft Version); Presented at the 2005 Annual ICA Meeting